Toolman 100% local

23 cm / 9 in square vs 20 × 30 cm traybake

23 cm / 9 in square20 × 30 cm traybake
Size23 × 23 cm20 × 30 cm
Base area529 cm²600 cm²
Usual depth5 cm5 cm
Holds2.65 L2.7 L

Can you swap them?

Swap without changing the recipe, but watch the oven. 20 × 30 cm traybake has 13.4% more area, so a mixture written for 23 cm / 9 in square sits about 88% as deep in it and browns sooner.

Nothing standard sits between these two, so this is the smallest change available in this shape.

Scaling the recipe

Recipe written forBaked inMultiply byOr leave it and get
23 cm / 9 in square20 × 30 cm traybake1.1388% of the depth
20 × 30 cm traybake23 cm / 9 in square0.88113% of the depth

Multiply every ingredient, including the eggs — round to the nearest half egg and adjust the liquid rather than rounding a whole one up.

Baking time

A mixture 88% as deep is done earlier, not cooler. Leave the temperature alone, start testing at about 88% of the stated time, and let the skewer decide. Why depth sets the time and diameter barely does →

Frequently asked questions

Can I use a 20 × 30 cm traybake instead of a 23 cm / 9 in square?

Yes, with the mixture multiplied by 1.13. 20 × 30 cm traybake has 600 cm² of base against 529 cm², so an unscaled 23 cm / 9 in square recipe sits 88% as deep and bakes faster.

What is the difference between a 23 cm / 9 in square and a 20 × 30 cm traybake?

23 cm / 9 in square has a base area of 529 cm² and 20 × 30 cm traybake has 600 cm² — 20 × 30 cm traybake is 13.4% larger. At their usual depths they hold 2.65 L and 2.7 L.

Do I need to change the baking time between a 23 cm / 9 in square and a 20 × 30 cm traybake?

Yes. Moving a 23 cm / 9 in square mixture into 20 × 30 cm traybake makes it 88% as deep, so start checking at about 88% of the stated time. Depth drives baking time far more than tin diameter does.

Related comparisons

23 cm / 9 in square in full · 20 × 30 cm traybake in full · All tin comparisons · All baking tin sizes