73 in Roman numerals
LXXIII
The number 73 is written LXXIII in Roman numerals.
How LXXIII breaks down
| Symbols | Value |
|---|---|
L | 50 |
XX | 2 × 10 = 20 |
III | 3 × 1 = 3 |
LXXIII | 73 |
Every symbol here is written in descending order and simply added together — no subtractive pairs are involved.
Nearby numbers
| Number | Roman numeral |
|---|---|
| 68 | LXVIII |
| 69 | LXIX |
| 70 | LXX |
| 71 | LXXI |
| 72 | LXXII |
| 73 | LXXIII |
| 74 | LXXIV |
| 75 | LXXV |
| 76 | LXXVI |
| 77 | LXXVII |
| 78 | LXXVIII |
The seven symbols
I | 1 | C | 100 |
V | 5 | D | 500 |
X | 10 | M | 1,000 |
L | 50 |
73 in other notations
| Roman | LXXIII |
| Binary | 1001001 |
| Hexadecimal | 49 |
| Octal | 111 |
| Written out | seventy-three |
Writing it by hand
Work down through the symbol values, taking as many of each as will fit before moving to the next. For 73:
L = 50 remaining: 23
2 × X = 20 remaining: 3
3 × I = 3 remaining: 0The result reads LXXIII — 6 characters, against 2 digits in Arabic numerals. The verbosity at numbers like this is precisely why positional notation replaced the system for arithmetic.
Frequently asked questions
What is 73 in Roman numerals?
LXXIII
How do you read LXXIII?
Work left to right, adding each symbol — except where a smaller symbol precedes a larger one, in which case it is subtracted. L is 50, XX is 20, III is 3, giving 73 in total.
How do you write 73 in words?
seventy-three.
Why is there no zero?
Roman numerals have no symbol for zero. The concept reached Europe only with Hindu-Arabic numerals, centuries after the system was in use — which is a large part of why it was eventually replaced for arithmetic.